A wanton endangerment charge - *for the bullet that landed in her neighbor's apartment - NOT for Breonna's death.*
"(1)A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person.
(2) Wanton endangerment in the first degree is a Class D felony."
Okay, being that we have friends that are cops and friends who are people of color - and friends who are cops of color - I have tried every which way in the world to make sense of this ruling, looking at it from both sides.
However, the fact is - this ruling just doesn't make any sense.
And you're telling me the stray bullet in the neighbor's apartment is legally considered wanton endangerment, but shooting Breonna 5 times, while she lay unarmed in bed, isn't wanton endangerment?
Erm - did y'all not read the legal definition of wanton endangerment, according to Kentucky law?!?
Dohkay, Daniel "Uncle Tom" Cameron.
Seriously - there is no way to look at this ruling that makes any sense at all.
I at least expected the charges related to her death, and at the very least, a charge of manslaughter?!?
But her death as the result of stray bullets fired at Kenneth isn't even legally wanton endangerment - just the bullet that went into the neighbor's door??
I at least expected the charges related to her death, and at the very least, a charge of manslaughter?!?
But her death as the result of stray bullets fired at Kenneth isn't even legally wanton endangerment - just the bullet that went into the neighbor's door??
No other charges were made, to include the other officers who participated in the "no-knock" raid.
And again, may I remind you that this was a wrongful raid - Breonna's ex-boyfriend was using her address, to have packages delivered to her address, that he picked up, without her knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.