... splitting hairs on the definition of pedophile regarding Epstein.
Who does that, on either side of politics?
Especially considering that she, herself, is the mother of a 14-year-old girl?
WHY would she do that?
Read on ...
So Megyn Kelly - desperately trying to stay relevant after being fired from every legitimate news source in America, to include even Fox News - has found herself a new career in podcasting, in which she panders exclusively to the worst kind of white males in America.
(I mean, damn - how dishonest and ethically challenged ARE you, if even Fox News won't ever work with you again? đŸ˜‚)
Not even posting a picture of her or linking to her podcast, because that's why she says this inane, ignorant stuff, to get attention for her podcast.
So after this post, I will never mention her again, hoping she once again falls into disgrace and obscurity.
Because this week, after the Epstein emails were released, she said:
"He was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls. And I realize this is disgusting. I'm definitely not trying to make an excuse for this. I'm just giving you facts, that he wasn't into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby."
“We have yet to see anybody come forward and say 'I was under 10, I was under 14.' There’s a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old.”
What the ???
Um - 15 is NOT "barely legal" - it's unequivocally illegal!
In fact, it's still 3 years away from legal!
There's also a "world of difference" between a 15-year-old girl and an 18-year-old girl, Megyn - physically, emotionally, and intellectually.
(In fact, being that I was underweight, I was underdeveloped and didn't have my period until I was 16. I developed by leaps and bounds by the time I was 18, physically, emotionally, and intellectually.)
So pray tell, Megyn - WHY are you playing the semantics game in semi-defense of Epstein?
Could it possibly be that Epstein's emails clearly state that your pimp, Trump, knew all about it?
(Well, in your case, you might, if someone paid you enough.)
Go former Hollywood child stars, Melissa Gilbert, Valerie Bertinelli, and Christina Ricci for taking her on!
However, at the same time, I think we should all just start to ignore her, because we're giving her what she wants - more publicity for her white-male-power-abuser- ass-kissing podcast, because no credible news source will hire her.
Speaking of Melissa Gilbert and Megyn Kelly, Megyn Kelly imagines she's good at clapbacks, but she always ends up embarrassing herself.
Because the truth is - she's not very bright.
She seems to only comprehend the literal, almost incapable of thinking outside of the box, or thinking through her own arguments very well, before she says them.
Case in point, what she said about Netflix's forthcoming Little House on the Prairie reboot:
Kelly: "Netflix, if you wokeify Little House on the Prairie, I will make it my singular mission to absolutely ruin your project."
Gilbert: "Ummm…watch the original again. TV doesn’t get too much more ‘woke’ than we did. We tackled: racism, addiction, nativism, antisemitism, misogyny, rape, spousal abuse and every other ‘woke ‘ topic you can think of. Thank you very much."
Again ... ewwwwwww!
God, that is so early last century - and gives the rest of us a bad name.
______________________
PS
I admit it, I'm finally pissed about my personal situation.
It's taken me a while to get here, but I am.
And it felt good to take it out on Megyn Kelly, as the worst-case-scenario poster child for the type of woman who dismisses the concerns of other women, or worse, throws them under the bus, to get ahead or to get what she wants.
And guess what?
I'm not sorry.
In fact, I feel better!
Thank you, Megyn Kelly, for being an absolute sh*t of a woman and human being, so that I could use you as my verbal whipping post and feel a little less powerless in my own situation? đŸ˜‚
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.