A little bit frustrated today with my healthcare situation.
I feel really bad saying what I'm about to say, because this person was SUCH a nice guy, super intelligent, and spent a lot of time with us - but what also may be true is that he may be just a little bit kookaburra? 😂
So I was told today by an MD - someone who should know better - that you can reduce plaque buildup in your arteries by switching to a vegetarian - and especially vegan - diet.
This MD literally said that I could reduce my plaque burden back to zero, if I just became a vegetarian, especially if I could become a vegan.
Um - no.
Not only has that not been scientifically proven, but it may not even be possible.
I didn't argue this point, just listened - because from what I know from both school and medical transcription largely in cardiology, once you have plaque, you have it for life - you can't eradicate it without intervention - all you can do is stabilize it and prevent it from getting worse?
In fact, when I got home, I researched the very physician's studies that he quote, Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr.
That much we already know and has been proven over and over.
The only mention I could find of actually reversing plaque build-up was an editorial paper written by Dr. Esselstyn that said he "believed" it could reverse plaque burden, based on a small prior study where some of the participants did show somewhat of a reversal in plaque burden, but it's not understood why just in those patients and needs further study.
In all the studies I read on his work, nowhere, at any time, did Dr. Esselstyn ever once say that someone reduced their plaque burden back to 0%!
Once you have plaque in your arteries, though a plant-based diet can help lower your cholesterol and thereby prevent further plaque build-up and may even stabilize it, once plaque is there, it's there until it's removed or bypassed around - period.
In other words, at present, you CANNOT eradicate existing plaque without intervention, particularly if calcified.
If you could, there'd be no need for interventional cardiology or cardiothoracic surgery for blockages and our docs would be telling us to stop completely all food with meat, fat, or oils of any kind, but they do not.
Then he went down a rabbit hole about flock cameras and government monitoring and not trusting pharmaceutical companies in favor of natural medicine.
Um ... it's not that I DO necessarily trust these things ... but methinks a combination of natural products and pharmaceuticals yield the best results, it's not "either/or."
Also, I always wonder about people who worry so much about government monitoring, like ... "What in the heck are you doing that you shouldn't be, to the degree that you think the government would be targeting you as a nobody, with little to no power?" 😂
And usually, it's the same people who trust Trump blindly without realizing the smeller may be the feller.
I mean, the vindictive. vengeful, paranoid degree to which Trump goes after his political opponents does worry me.
(As does his overreach like using taxpayer money to fund his political commercials recently or ignoring constitutional protections completely.)
Also, ICE's overreach and brutality is starting to scare us all!
Except Trumpers who seem to justify this level of government overreach when it comes to Trump, for reasons I don't understand, - because if Obama or Biden even did any of that, they'd be in the streets with AR-15s!
As for flock cameras, yes, they are fraught with issues (mostly misidentification) - but they've also helped catch a few criminals, too.
The same is true for pharmaceuticals.
I just don't think it's that "either/or" or we should throw the baby out with the bathwater, just do better and monitor the monitors?
I dunno, it's like I don't trust government OR corporations, but I also don't distrust them until they give me a reason not to (and some have), especially at a local level?
And prove it?
Proof should still be required.
You can believe whatever you want to, even after you watch a video with no context, but you should still ask for proof and critically think through it, like "If not AI, what context was this in and are there any other possibilities that could explain what I'm believing?"
I think of this particularly with the "stolen election" ballot videos of mail bags being "dumped."
Um - turns out, they were proven to be in transport to the vote-counting facilities and accounted for - NOT being dumped in trash bins!
Also, some of the doctors I've seen recently "believe" that smoking is a bad habit easily quit.
I had one doc say "You're so logical, being logical is very important to you, so it's just so illogical that you smoke, I don't get it."
Um - no one ever said smoking is logical - and quitting smoking is NOT just a will power thing and we need to stop smoking, or any addiction, as weakness or lack of will power.
Smoking is a true addiction - both psychologically AND physiologically addictive.
In fact, nicotine is just as addictive to heroin because it quickly and directly boosts dopamine short-term; therefore, it is just as hard to quit as heroin.
You have to have a plan and a good replacement, it's not as simple as "Oh, it's illogical for me to smoke; thus, I'll just put them down" and expect to quit - because your brain literally develops more nicotine receptors craving it and the cravings will increase over time.
I never argue with any of these people, I just listen - but it's become clear to me that like our politics here, especially in Kentucky, even with doctors, belief Trumps fact.
I did try to tell one of the clinicians the multitude of scientific studies on how smoking is physically addictive, too, very politely and she said "Yeah, yeah, yeah, studies, whatever - I believe it's just a bad habit you can stop."
I mean, I can want to believe that nothing but rainbows fly out of my pug's butt - and only the pug breed - but my belief doesn't make it fact! 😂
Evidence and proof that's been put the to test by ruling out other possibilities is still important!
(And I mean, if I really believed rainbows flew out of my pug's butt anyway, then I would expect someone to have my eyes and brain checked! lol
I think when we're seeing actual MDs choose belief over fact without testing their beliefs, have an apparent inability to read clinical trials fully without focusing on only the parts they already want to believe, and/or lose the ability to critically think?
Houston, we have a problem.
And although I believe it's a nationwide problem that's increasing, nowhere have I seen belief Trump fact like the South, ESPECIALLY in Kentucky.





