Epstein's 2011 Emails To Trump, Released Today ...

Whooaa - bombshell! 

The House Oversight Committee obtained emails from Epstein to Trump from Epstein's estate - and they are damning!

Trump was at Epstein's house for hours with a known victim present?

Epstein called him "The dog who won't bark?" (Meaning Trump won't tell on him.)

Trump asking him to stop trafficking young girls shortly before they parted ways, but never told authorities?

WOW, is it my birthday? 😂

Because I've been trying to tell people about this and the strange comments Trump made in New York Magazine in October 2002 about his buddy, Epstein, since Trump's first campaign in 2015, but  few would listen! 

And here was the most damning quote from Trump about Epstein, indicating that Trump knew ...

"He likes beautiful women beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

That was hint enough - but these emails are smoking-gun, proving Trump knew - and never told the authorities!

Now - what these emails do NOT definitively prove, is whether  Epstein meant Trump sexually engaged with the victim himself - because the subject matter was possible witnesses called. 

So it could just mean they were discussing whether Trump would be called as a witness or not, because he was there for hours once. 

BTW, the victim is the late Virginia Giuffre, who said Trump was never inappropriate with her.

Then again, Virginia also claimed she was drugged at times, so who knows?

Do I believe it's possible Trump was with minors, too, just not Giuffre?

It's possible - I'm just saying this email doesn't prove he was with Giuffre, just that he was present and knew.

I'm sure Trump will call it fake news or say Democrats fabricated it because it was Dems on the House Oversight Committee who released it to the press.

However, there are also Republicans on this committee, and thus far, they've been silent. 

Fox News has been silent.

Trump himself has been silent. 

I know that politicians are some duplicitous people, but there are many people on both sides of politics who can't stomach trafficking of children - I'd like to think the Republicans on this committee don't have souls THAT dark to cover for him on this one.

Regardless, here's the funny thing about evidence and fact - you have to be willing to actually view it, despite their beliefs  - and if so, without wearing rose-colored glasses, eyes wide open, no excuses?

In other words, since we know biased belief often "trumps" fact, (pun intended) - who will actually view the evidence, without rose-colored glasses on?

It takes tremendous bravery to challenge your belief system, get over your bias and cognitive dissonance to see truth (I know because I've done it) - which is terrifying for most people, too much for the ego/psyche.

Because what they're scared of is not just finding out everything they previously believed is a lie, but in cases like these, they're scared supporting someone capable of these things also means they were somehow complicit.

No - supporting someone who turned out to be a monster does NOT automatically mean you were complicit. 

It usually means you were fooled by a good manipulator..

And being fooled doesn't mean you're stupid, either - it means your good heart trusted a good manipulator - period.

Should you have listened more to the other side and paid attention more to red flags?

Yup - but that still doesn't mean you were complicit.

Super interesting this happened today, for reasons I'll keep to myself.

But it does give me hope regarding that personal situation.

Sometimes it takes a really long time for the truth to come out, but it always does - sometimes long after were gone, yes - but it always does.

And yet some people will still continue to believe what they want to believe despite fact and truth. Nothing you can do about that

Speaking of which, I had a couple of posts on here about my personal life, but I was getting 20 to 25 hits a day only on certain posts, all from the same geolocation in the U.S. and I started to got a little creeped out. 

NOT because what I said wasn't true, it most certainly is - but just to avoid a problem with them (even though I never named names or gave details that would give away where this was happening.)

(No, it's not Mark or any of my family.)

Few read here anyway, or even know about this blog, and I'm not on social media, so that's why the hits were kind of telltale about who it was. 

I'm thinking to myself, "Considering the history here, what are they doing specifically on these posts 20 to 25 times a day, what are they looking for? Ways to try to manipulate me again, back into their good graces?  Something they can use against me? Regardless, 20 to 25 times a day is a little obsessive - yikes!"

Then I decided - whatever.

I have nothing to hide and hiding my blog looks guilty.And I'm not changing who I am anymore to placate/appease this person just to keep them from going off on me again,  I've walked on eggshells enough.

I did park the last few posts about it in draft - not because they're not true or I said something awful - but just to avoid future problems and as a signal I want to move on.

Because I began blogging at a time where I had no say and no voice in my life - and I'm not about to give it up now or feel bullied out of that, too.

You play your games elsewhere if you want, but this is MY house.

So I'm back 😂

Onwards and upwards ...