Though I am fairly immune to jumping to conclusions without proof, that doesn't mean I don't have my own speculations about things - I just need more evidence before I believe them or don't believe them. They just sit in a gray questioning zone.
For example, ever since my main diagnosis after the crash was "blunt-force trauma injury to the abdomen," I can't stop thinking about the last time I heard that particular phrase.
The last time I heard that phrase said was when Ivana Trump supposedly died from falling down the stairs.
I already thought it was odd at the time, but since I had my own diagnosis of blunt force trauma injury of the abdomen, I think it's even more odd.
So ... my blunt-force trauma injury to the abdomen was obtained by crashing into someone turning left at a flashing yellow arrow, going 45 miles per hour.
Specifically, it was seatbelt injury specifically caused by:
1). Rapid deceleration.
2) The front end of our car being totally smashed in towards us - the car is totalled.
3) My airbag not deploying properly.
I mean, it felt like somebody literally hit me in the stomach as hard as they could with a baseball bat!
But you're telling me that Ivana Trump died from even worse blunt force trauma to the abdomen - just from falling down stairs???
How could a human get THAT much momentum and force going in a hit to the abdomen just from falling down stairs - enough to cause her death - see what I mean?
Allrighty, but I'm not sure that makes sense.
Maybe I'm wrong, but it's just it took so much momentum and force to result in that same diagnosis, but I didn't die, so ...?
See what I mean and why I question that?
Like I said, I could be wrong and I'd need more evidence - but of course, we'd likely never get any either way.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.