Aw, Dang - I Missed The Political Prostitute Party, Hosted By JD Vance and Megyn Kelly! 😉

*Edited, new video added, featuring how the DW scene actually ended😂

So this post was originally supposed to be about just the Kentucky-Fried Prick AKA as JD Vance - and I say that even as Kentuckian myself - and his failed attempt to clap back at Jennifer Aniston on Megyn Kelly 's show. 

However, I then realized Megyn Kelly and JD Vance are two peas in a pod, as far as what I like to call "political prostitution."

What do I mean? 

JD Vance - who initially said that "Trump could be the American Hitler" and "cultural heroin" - has only recently become Trump's biggest nauseating brownnoser, such that Trump chose him as his running mate..

Megyn Kelly - quit right-wing Fox News, after sparring with Trump and sexual harassment accusations against Roger Ailes - then hired by left-wing NBC - then fired by NBC for inappropriate blackface commentary on her talk show.  

Now she says she's independent on her podcast, but is clearly back to cheering on Trump and peddling right-wing lies and BS.

See what I mean? 

Not just their political positions, but their actual values, are for sale,  to the highest bidder.

Then, this past week, a past clip of JD Vance on Tucker Carlson's show in 2021 resurfaced, where again, he said this:

 

"A bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they've made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable too. It's just a basic fact. You look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC, the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children." And how does it make any sense that we've turned our country over to people who don't really have a direct stake in it."

Then Jennifer Aniston -  who revealed in 2022 that she struggled with fertility treatments, trying to have children when previously married -  and who has stayed away from saying anything remotely political until now ...

... said this via X ...

“All I can say is… Mr. Vance, I pray that your daughter is fortunate enough to bear children of her own one day.  I hope she will not need to turn to IVF as a second option. Because you are trying to take that away from her, too.”

JD Vance has retorted - via Megyn Kelly's podcast ...

"Well, first of all, that's disgusting because my daughter is 2 years old. And second of all, if she had fertility problems, as I said in that speech, I would try everything I could to try to help her because I believe families and babies are a good thing."

Then he goes on to say that he was "just being sarcastic" - his remarks were taken out of context and that he was not criticizing women with fertility issues, but rather arguing that Democrats were "anti-family."

Of course, not a single word of that is true.

First of all, it's "disgusting" to think about his daughter having children of her own someday?

Wait, wasn't his entire point supposed to be having children means investment in the future? 

Secondly, what a disgusting, horrible, mean thing for Jennifer to say, praying for his daughter, wasn't it?  😉

Now THAT is SARCASM, JD -  since you seem confused about the definition. 

"Sarcasm is saying the opposite of what you really think in an exaggerated way, for the sake of humor.

"Reductio ad absurdum" is arguing your point out to an absurd degree, just to make a point or for humorous effect.

I think the latter is what you're saying you were doing, not sarcasm? 

(Dang, dude - didn't you go to Yale Law School?)

And when RAA is done at the expense of others, like his was, just to seem superior, the only people that find that funny are other people with no other discernible sense of humor than cruelty - ya know, your typical gaggle of Republicans,

After all, there's a reason why Republicans don't make good host late-night talk shows.

Lastly, of course, we're not "anti-family" - we're about family-planning at the right time, as well as children as a result of consensual sex, rather than sex forced upon on us through rape or incest.

Then, of course, Megyn - his fellow political prostitute for hire - said that she knew his remark "tongue-in-cheek." 

(Wow, do Republican journalists and lawyers really not know what these terms mean?)

Then said, "Well now, all this s*** has run, has rained down on him like he hates women and he hates people who have no children and that's not true."

No one said he hates women - they said he blanket-generalized women without children unfairly as all being "miserable," and insinuated lesser value for votes and political contributions from people - particularly women - who don't have children, because he said they didn't have a stake in the future - which he absolutely did say!

I can't believe there'd be any woman in America - including nuns (since JD has converted to Catholicism) - who would defend what JD Vance said about childless women, considering we've all had a friend or coworker or family member who couldn't conceive and know how much pain, even shame, that caused them.

Then Megyn launched into this irrelevant nonsense ....

"Where was Jennifer Aniston standing up for little girls who are getting their breasts chopped off for political purposes by people who are shoving this gender ideology down their throats without figuring out that they might just be temporarily depressed or who are being forced to compete against boys in high school sports to the point where they wind up partially paralyzed and permanent nerve damage?

Then to top it all off, Megyn X-ed out THIS about Kamala Harris, as if she knows it for a fact ...

 
   

Does she think it wise to get on the subject of affairs by presidential candidates?

I mean, none of our candidates were just found guilty by a jury of paying off their former trysts with porn stars to hide them during an election, after all. 

Alllllll right, that's it -  she's getting on my very last nerve, so brace yourselves - I'm 'bout to clock a bitch,  full-on Julia Sugarbaker style, from Designing Women 😂  

Except in this case, I'd say something like ...

 

Oh, Megyn, Dear - a word, please?   😂 

Girl, focus - we're talking about women's fertility and family planning, NOT gender identity - two separate issues. 

Quite frankly, I don't understand how you equated them, nor why you imagined that an appropriate rebuttal to what Jennifer Aniston said? 

(Don't answer that, Dear, it's rhetorical. No one is at all interested in seeing your your saccharine, ass-kissing of conservative white men any further, just to stay relevant and for ratings - except maybe the not-so-bright white conservative men that you're so transparently ego-stroking.)

Even IF it were true that Kamala "slept her way to the top" OR that "girls were mutilating themselves by lopping off their breasts over politics" - which it's not - at least it's just their bodies?

Bitch, your actual soul is for sale to the highest political bidder.   😂

First, you're right-wing values at Fox News, then you're left-wing values at NBC, then you're back to right wing again (calling yourself "independent," but clearly supporting Trump/right-wing lies again).

 

Speaking of which, both you and JD Vance both were all like "I HATE Trump" from 2016 to 2020, but now you're all "I LOVE Trump" 😂😂😂     

So I'd be very careful about either of you accusing anyone of prostituting/mutilating themselves over career and politics, if I were you - people who live in glass houses not throwing stones, ya know."

Ah, that feels better! 😂